- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
- Location
- Plymouth, UK
I would throw in a few points (re-enforcing some already made):
Small CPU SMP folders (dual core etc) getting low points should just live with it as part of progress - its the worls of PC's right!
- PG are keeping this all in perspective with work output and its following a Long term progress flow.
GPUs are doing amazing things with their amazing performance + being rightfully rewarded for it.
- One modern GPU like a 7970 or better has better TFLOP performance than the most powerful $100 million Super Computer on the planet back in 2001 (and those cost $6 million+ a year in power bills)
and Here is the Problem :
SMP BA folders get excessive points (over work done) rewarded to encourage folders to invest and fold for reward in an area that is Important to PG for study.
- PG have been cultivating a competitive race for PPD to encourage folders.
Trouble here Now is they are dumping/turning peoples Expensive tech invested BA hardware into yesterdays hardware early by raising the BA bar too fast too soon with too little notice.
- PG need to avoid spurning (outside the natural tech advancement curve dating tech - like dual core CPUs) the competitive nature of folding they have so carefully cultivated
Like already mentioned by Adak - folding@home needs better community feedback from their end and smoother WU development progression especially in areas where folders invest lots of money with PGs encouragement.
- simply telling BA folders to fold regular SMP WU for the cause and be good Samaritans is not fair given the competitive environment PG created at the BA end of folding.
But despite all this, at the end of the day we ARE Folding for a Good Cause and not the points - and rather than getting vibes of out of touch Execs thinking only of profit margins, it would be Really nice to feel they are standing next to us in this team play : Its Good to Talk right
(my drop in folding it purely coincidental financial issues soon to be resolved)
Small CPU SMP folders (dual core etc) getting low points should just live with it as part of progress - its the worls of PC's right!
- PG are keeping this all in perspective with work output and its following a Long term progress flow.
GPUs are doing amazing things with their amazing performance + being rightfully rewarded for it.
- One modern GPU like a 7970 or better has better TFLOP performance than the most powerful $100 million Super Computer on the planet back in 2001 (and those cost $6 million+ a year in power bills)
and Here is the Problem :
SMP BA folders get excessive points (over work done) rewarded to encourage folders to invest and fold for reward in an area that is Important to PG for study.
- PG have been cultivating a competitive race for PPD to encourage folders.
Trouble here Now is they are dumping/turning peoples Expensive tech invested BA hardware into yesterdays hardware early by raising the BA bar too fast too soon with too little notice.
- PG need to avoid spurning (outside the natural tech advancement curve dating tech - like dual core CPUs) the competitive nature of folding they have so carefully cultivated
Like already mentioned by Adak - folding@home needs better community feedback from their end and smoother WU development progression especially in areas where folders invest lots of money with PGs encouragement.
- simply telling BA folders to fold regular SMP WU for the cause and be good Samaritans is not fair given the competitive environment PG created at the BA end of folding.
But despite all this, at the end of the day we ARE Folding for a Good Cause and not the points - and rather than getting vibes of out of touch Execs thinking only of profit margins, it would be Really nice to feel they are standing next to us in this team play : Its Good to Talk right
(my drop in folding it purely coincidental financial issues soon to be resolved)