First off, make no mistake; I DO NOT belong here. I don't start this thread because I know anything about the subject, but because I think a discussion of the subject would be interesting and fruitful. (I hope I didn't make too many errors in this post; I'm not familiar w/ the terms and such. Thanks for your patience.)
I'm not so much interested in overclocking using higher frequency crystals; I just wondered if the "turbo pll" principle could be used on todays mainboards as a hardware clock lock. Or could it be used on a board such as the nForce2 to decrease the memory speed (assuming that option isn't available in bios), in combination w/ dual ddr to eliminate the fsb ceiling created by ddr speed limits w/out creating a memory bottlneck. Throw in a pci clock lock, and where is the limit for fsb? Who knows?
This of course makes assumptions that the above operations are available to be modified, and not burried in the core of the northbridge. I have no idea if that's the case, but it's worth discussing. That's why I made this thread. That's also why I'm officially bowing out of the discussion, because I'm sure I have nothing left to offer on the subject...
I'm not so much interested in overclocking using higher frequency crystals; I just wondered if the "turbo pll" principle could be used on todays mainboards as a hardware clock lock. Or could it be used on a board such as the nForce2 to decrease the memory speed (assuming that option isn't available in bios), in combination w/ dual ddr to eliminate the fsb ceiling created by ddr speed limits w/out creating a memory bottlneck. Throw in a pci clock lock, and where is the limit for fsb? Who knows?
This of course makes assumptions that the above operations are available to be modified, and not burried in the core of the northbridge. I have no idea if that's the case, but it's worth discussing. That's why I made this thread. That's also why I'm officially bowing out of the discussion, because I'm sure I have nothing left to offer on the subject...