Features


Overclockers Forum

Shopping Search



Top Products


Motherboards

Intel

Abit

Gigabyte

Asus

EPoX

Iwill

MSI

Shuttle

Tyan

Soyo


Processors

AMD

Intel

Compaq


Cases

Antec

ATX

Enlight


Graphic Cards

Leadtek

ATI

Creative Labs

Hercules

MSI

VisionTek

nVidia


Memory

SDRAM

RDRAM

DDRAM

DDR


Sound Cards

Creative Labs

Jaton

SIIG

SB Live

Guillemot


Hard Drives

Fujitsu

IBM

Maxtor

Quantum


Networking

Linksys Lan Cards

Ethernet Cards

FDDI Cards

Networking Kits


Misc.

Monitors

CD Roms/Burners

Printers

Scanners

Software

REVIEWS & TIPS
Over 1000 Topics

ACCESSORIES
ADAPTERS
BEGINNER GUIDES
BENCHMARKING
BIOS
BUYING ADVICE
BX COOLER
CASE COOLING
CASE REVIEWS
CONTESTS
CONTROLLERS
CPU REVIEWS AND TIPS
HARD DRIVES
HEATSINK REVWS AND TIPS
HUMAN INTEREST
MEMORY MISCELLANEOUS
MOTHERBOARD REVIEWS
OVERCLOCKING EXPERIENCES AND TIPS
PELTIERS
PROBLEM PRODUCTS
REPAIRS
SYSTEM COOLERS
SYSTEM REVIEWS
THERMAL GREASE
UTILITIES
VENDOR REVIEWS
VIDEO CARD COOLING AND PERFORMANCE
VIDEO CARD REVIEWS
WATER COOLING


Please read EMAIL FAQs first: Comments, suggestions, and questions to Joe Citarella, Skip MacWilliam, or Ed Stroligo

"Overclockers.com Waterblock Test Results"
Joe Citarella


The following summary plots waterblock cooling performance based on CPU Die Simulator against each waterblock's pressure drop. The Die Simulator is a pure performance test which excludes secondary heatpath effects found on motherboards.

Pressure Drop is an important consideration in waterblock purchases. If two waterblocks have equal C/Ws, the one with a lower pressure drop will not require as strong a pump (measured by head) compared to the other. Conversely, a waterblock with a superior C/W which shows a large pressure drop may require an expensive pump to attain performance at even one gpm.

Results are presented at one gpm because tests indicate that one gpm is an important "dividing point" for several reasons:

  • Most moderate waterpumps (eg, 150-300 gph with 60" head) will deliver one gpm in a fully configured system (one waterblock, radiator with ½" tubing and fittings), with minimal restrictions
  • Many waterblocks will show a performance gain of about 1-2 C up to 2-3 gpm
  • Many waterblocks will show a performance decrease of about 1-4 C substantially below one gpm

For most systems, considering waterpump cost, one gpm is within reach and a good cost/performance tradeoff. Waterpumps which can achieve higher flowrates are higher cost, much larger and add more heat to cooling fluid than a moderately powered waterpump.

Interpreting Results

The C/Ws in this summary indicate the difference, in degrees Centigrade, among the waterblocks tested. For example, at 100 watts, the difference between waterblock A and B is three degrees C; at 50 watts, 1 ½ C, and so on. Closely ranked waterblocks may, in fact, show little or no difference, or even reverse positions, when compared in a specific system and especially at heat loadings of 50 watts or less.

The best possible combination: Low C/W and low pressure.

CPU WATERBLOCK TEST RESULTS

Test Conditions: Inlet Water Temp: 28.5 C; Mounting force: 15 pounds; Heat Load: 70 Watts.

Plot

Plot

Waterblock
C/W
Pressure Drop - psi
Pressure Drop - inches H2O
Swiftech Storm Waterblock
0.12
2.74
75.8
Hydrocool Hydro-Stream HS5
0.12
3.50
96.9
Viscool CPU
0.13
0.67
18.5
White Water
0.13
0.49
13.5
Viscool CPU V2
0.13
1.39
38.5
D-TEK White Water
0.13
0.82
22.7
Asetek Antarctica Waterblock
0.13
0.88
24.4
Danger Den RBX
0.13
0.59
16.3
Danger Den TDX
0.14
0.51
14.1
Danger Den TDX Silver
0.14
0.62
17.2
Radiical WHX
0.14
0.74
20.4
Silverprop Cyclone Evolutions V2.0
0.14
0.73
20.2
Swiftech MCW6000
0.14
0.93
25.7
Silverprop Cyclone Evolutions V2.5
0.14
0.65
18.0
EK Wave
0.15
0.42
11.6
AquaJoe AquaGold
0.15
0.80
22.1
Silverprop Cyclone
0.15
0.67
18.5
Swiftech MCW5002TM
0.15
0.31
8.6
Swiftech MCW 5000-ATM
0.15
0.37
10.2
Innovatek X-Flow
0.15
2.65
73.4
X4Pro X3M
0.16
0.43
11.9
OC Labs
0.16
1.24
34.3
PolarFlo
0.17
0.46
12.7
EK-WW Waterblock
0.17
0.63
17.4
Zalman ZM-WB2 Waterblock
0.17
0.56
15.5
Danger Den Maze 4
0.18
0.12
3.3
InnovaCOOL Rev4
0.18
0.86
23.8
BeCooling Slit Edge
0.18
0.15
4.2
D-TEK Spiral
0.19
0.25
6.9
Asetek Waterblock
0.20
0.56
15.5
Sleeth 1 Waterblock
0.24
1.04
29.9

NOTE: These results are NOT comparable to tests done by others.

CHIPSET WATERBLOCKS

Test Conditions: Inlet Water Temp: 28.5 C; Mounting force: 15 pounds; Heat Load: 70 Watts.

Plot

Waterblock
C/W
Pressure Drop - psi
Pressure Drop - inches H2O
Silverprop Cyclone NexusLX
0.16
0.49
13.6
Danger Den GPU Maze4 Waterblock
0.17
0.26
7.2
Swiftech MCW50
0.18
0.26
7.2
Asetek Chipset Waterblock
0.19
0.68
18.8
Danger Den Chipset Maze4 Waterblock
0.19
0.13
3.6
Swiftech MCW20-R
0.22
0.23
6.4

NOTE: These results are NOT comparable to tests done by others.

Email Joe


<< back to home